That isn't to say that there isn't some nice stuff. There is a Warhol piece 'Silver Clouds' which, if deconstructed could be dismissed as simply some helium filled balloons being blown about by a fan, but which, in place, is actually rather splendid. The best pieces are some exquisite 4,000 year old jade discs from China. They are here because no-one knows their original use, but their effect, far from supporting the exhibition curator's hypothesis, is instead to highlight the importance of craftsmanship. For me the futility of the whole thing is exemplified by the eoliths on display. They are meant to pose the philosophical question as to how there importance has changed now it is known that they are natural rather than man made. Now I, self-evidently, do like a philosophical question, but not one of those for which the answer is bleedin' obvious. They clearly do not now have any importance, except as a minor, minor footnote in the history of how science sometimes gets things wrong.
So why do exhibitions like this get put on? In the words of the Nobel Prize winner Seamus Heaney whose death has been announced today (1).
'Now, you're supposed to be
An educated man, '
I hear him say. 'Puzzle me
The right answer to that one.'
An educated man, '
I hear him say. 'Puzzle me
The right answer to that one.'
And on the subject of bad science, this is interesting.
I also attended a lecture on the subject of the Cyclops through the ages, starting - reasonably enough - with Homer and moving via Harryhausen to Spongebob Squarepants. Fascinating.
Well, if you get your news in early, you have more time for analysis.
ReplyDeleteIs there, perhaps, a surfeit of available exibition space? I was discussing last night with some friends the possibility of an exhibtion which consisted entirely of Brian Sewell being slapped with a large haddock. It needs some work, but it has possibilities.